coming back home from syd's dinner and remembering all those conversations i had with the guys regarding foowai's music, i am bombarded by my own thoughts again of life. and of art. what art does for you. what constitute to good art. and all the more so with the recent overstated controversy surrounding uob's painting competition, i gathered my own wondering thoughts while journeying home.
[anyway, i have uploaded my own pictures and my thoughts on them on my tumblr blog @ http://pagesfromthescrapbook.tumblr.com]
sigur ros.
most of my friends have never hear of them. but thats ok. they arent the most exciting bands around. and neither have they commercialized their music. so we ended up talking about their music and how it can mean so many things to the listener. their music is largely non-lyrical. and even then, they are in icelandic, so i presume most of us dont really know whats going on despite the songs' (occasional) english titles. in any case, (although i've already explained this to david and syd) i think without the contraints of words, the songs are somewhat abstract and its ability to connect with the listener happens on so many levels. without words, we are free of directions. we are completely left on our own to steer our hearts and minds, not shanghaied by the artist's words. we are no longer fed the artist's version, and with that, the songs become our own in some way. one song has a whole different meaning to me now compared to you because we arent held captive by its lyrics. so while we are catching the updraft of the songs' melodies, our hearts are kept busy on its own. running on its own fury or fuel to foreign places. our minds alluding to our own experience. that is why sigur ros' music as a art has a special place in my heart and i know that for every other fan, every piece defines a different slice of their lives. and their songs are as much a small part of you.
that to me is the best selling point for any piece of art, albeit the medium. whether it be traditional painting, modern dance or alternative photography. be it traditional, modern or simply avant garde. the art has to feed you your soul. not just swallow the artist's perceptions. and that is why ultimately art is so subjective and the price we pay for a piece of genuine art becomes a controversy itself altogether. but all in all, i think the piece has to contain a part of the artist too. it is with the artist's intepretation that we intepret on our own to find ourselves in his shoes. a kind of reflexive exchange between the artist and the knowing viewer. listen to his strokes. see the melody filling your heart. smell the picture. art is meant to transcend and transpire.
feed me my heart for all it's worth.
Chatboard (0)